| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 |
181. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Fon Revedhort wrote: CCP Tallest wrote: In this thread, I've read several very good reasons why the fighter change is a bad idea. You are right. Fighters should stay the way they are. The change would be unfair for carriers. The poor perf...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.12 01:48:00
|
182. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
So, took a look at what happens when you run tracking mods and links on a titan. Erebus Meta 2 Blasters (24+26 km AM, 78+26 Iron, assuming tracking is not quite that important at range, 2x optimal gives 102+42, and this is the shortest range tita...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.12 01:47:00
|
183. What is the end-game now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
xxxak wrote: Now that supers have been nerfed into the ground, CCP has about 6 months to come up with a new "end-game" or this game will be dead. Hardcore, "hobby" type players are the core of EVE. The people who drive fights, produce the most...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.12 00:52:00
|
184. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
WiredMerchant wrote: I have a great idea, If you don't live in Null Sec...get out of this forum, its not your problem. If you live in Low Sec... you are all about being overpowered and jumping one innocent (albait dumb) carebear stumbling thr...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.12 00:42:00
|
185. Sub-capitals are useless in fleet fights - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nova Fox wrote: Wait two super carriers on thier lonesome sinking 200 cruisers? Something isnt right here, those cruisers should have been able to defang the super carriers. I am assuming fighters are not used. Defang 2000 Beserker IIs
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.12 00:29:00
|
186. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sir Rup wrote: The problem as i see it is the fact that with this nerf Eny given alliance is gonna Win by numbers .. if you jump in a pretty standard fleet of 200 battleships or battelcruisers with logi ect and say 40 supers ... you lose the su...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.12 00:25:00
|
187. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
fenistil wrote: WHAT ABOUT HYBRID REBALANCE? What good does Moros do with 25% extra ROF if it can only hit capitals and structures in 20km Radius? What is the radius of large towers? 30km? So a Moros will already operate in Falloff at 0 on...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.12 00:13:00
|
188. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Carabusu wrote: Demon Azrakel wrote: Carabusu wrote: [quote=Demon Azrakel][quote=Carabusu] lol the point was that you had to choose 20 Fighters or 20 Bombers which sucks. For those of us that ACTUALLY fly Super Carriers, we know first h...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 22:37:00
|
189. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Carabusu wrote: Demon Azrakel wrote: Carabusu wrote: xxxak wrote: Update: This nerf = Win Subcap battle, Kill all supers on the field. So with this nerf, supers can no longer defend themselves from subcaps, and supers are committe...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 22:28:00
|
190. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mr'Capsule wrote: CCP have no idea about supercapital balance, listen to the guy above and the points made by a lot of others in this thread[/quote] On the implant set, just make crystals boost repair rate on armor and shields, while slaves...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 22:13:00
|
191. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Aurora Egnald wrote: Andreus Ixiris wrote: Aurora Egnald wrote: Dont need to , thats why I have an alt. Anything I want to say, I say with my main. What are you afraid of? Aurora Egnald wrote: Posting under my alt does not take any...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 22:09:00
|
192. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alik Fall92 wrote: Demon Azrakel wrote: Alik Fall92 wrote: i also just realized that two step, the famous exploiter of wh and breaker of game mechanics is ALSO CSM... dear god CCP what have you done to this game... hell following that ...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 22:06:00
|
193. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Manfred Sideous wrote: Vile rat wrote: Supercarriers were originally ships that were a modest increase over regular carriers and grotesquely priced as to be an end game ego ship. They were neat and something you pointed at "ooh look at that!...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 22:02:00
|
194. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mioelnir wrote: Malcanis wrote: The number of supercap pilots with incredibly unreliable connections amazes me. It's a mystery how you ever managed to amass the price of a super, what with your ISP kicking you off the server every 1000 secon...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 21:55:00
|
195. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alik Fall92 wrote: i also just realized that two step, the famous exploiter of wh and breaker of game mechanics is ALSO CSM... dear god CCP what have you done to this game... hell following that line of progression, unban kugu and invite him...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 21:53:00
|
196. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alik Fall92 wrote: yep, supers sure were flavor of the year, except erm theyve been flavor of the half decade but yeah, sure i'm the idiot edit: defiant? didnt you die 2yrs ago? gtfo... wheres the "dislike" button anyway? ? Name was mad...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 21:49:00
|
197. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
zulrock wrote: The problem with dreads is that they have **** tracking in siege they need to get a tracking buff so they can track a supercarrier that's moving but also there is a range problem too the super carrier should loose the range bonus...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 21:29:00
|
198. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alik Fall92 wrote: "some nyx pilot, some alliance" wrote: 22m in drones on my nyx pilot, refund that sp or i quit the game ^^ this tbh, dunno if it's been stated here yet already but suddenly theres ALOT of wasted sp on a SC pilot, cong...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 21:28:00
|
199. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Smoking Blunts wrote: Demon Azrakel wrote: Smoking Blunts wrote: why dont you just revert the changes, so that super carriers become motherships again. give players teh fighter bomber skill points back and be done with it. they woudl stil...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 21:20:00
|
200. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Smoking Blunts wrote: why dont you just revert the changes, so that super carriers become motherships again. give players teh fighter bomber skill points back and be done with it. they woudl still be useful, they wont do omfg damage anymore and...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 21:17:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |